Supreme Court of Sweden case B 2090-12

Summary

Supreme Court of Sweden case B 2090-12 is a decision of the Supreme Court of Sweden^[1].

Key Facts

• Supreme Court of Sweden case B 2090-12's instance of is recorded as decision of the Supreme Court of Sweden^[2].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case B 2090-12's language of work or name is recorded as Swedish^[3].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case B 2090-12's has part is recorded as majority opinion^[4].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case B 2090-12's has part is recorded as dissenting opinion^[5].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case B 2090-12's publication date is recorded as +2013-06-14T00:00:00Z^[6].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case B 2090-12's work available at URL is recorded as https://www.domstol.se/globalassets/filer/domstol/hogstadomstolen/avgoranden/2013/b-2090-12.pdf^[7].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case B 2090-12's applies to jurisdiction is recorded as Sweden^[8].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case B 2090-12's legal citation of this text is recorded as NJA 2013 s. 588^[9].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case B 2090-12's published in is recorded as Nytt juridiskt arkiv pt 1, 2013 volume^[10].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case B 2090-12's judge is recorded as Ella Nyström^[11].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case B 2090-12's judge is recorded as Gudmund Toijer^[12].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case B 2090-12's judge is recorded as Johnny Herre^[13].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case B 2090-12's judge is recorded as Agneta Bäcklund^[14].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case B 2090-12's judge is recorded as Svante O. Johansson^[15].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case B 2090-12's cites work is recorded as Supreme Court of Sweden case B 153-04^[16].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case B 2090-12's court is recorded as Supreme Court of Sweden^[17].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case B 2090-12's Supreme Court of Sweden case number is recorded as B2090-12^[18].