Supreme Court of Sweden case Ö 91-12

Summary

Supreme Court of Sweden case Ö 91-12 is a decision of the Supreme Court of Sweden^[1].

Key Facts

• Supreme Court of Sweden case Ö 91-12's instance of is recorded as decision of the Supreme Court of Sweden^[2].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case Ö 91-12's language of work or name is recorded as Swedish^[3].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case Ö 91-12's has part is recorded as majority opinion^[4].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case Ö 91-12's has part is recorded as dissenting opinion^[5].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case Ö 91-12's has part is recorded as addendum^[6].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case Ö 91-12's publication date is recorded as +2012-11-09T00:00:00Z^[7].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case Ö 91-12's work available at URL is recorded as https://www.domstol.se/globalassets/filer/domstol/hogstadomstolen/avgoranden/2012/o-91-12.pdf^[8].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case Ö 91-12's applies to jurisdiction is recorded as Sweden^[9].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case Ö 91-12's legal citation of this text is recorded as NJA 2012 s. 715^[10].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case Ö 91-12's published in is recorded as Nytt juridiskt arkiv pt 1, 2012 volume^[11].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case Ö 91-12's title is recorded as Det oönskade förvaltaruppdraget^[12].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case Ö 91-12's judge is recorded as Stefan Lindskog^[13].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case Ö 91-12's judge is recorded as Kerstin Calissendorff^[14].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case Ö 91-12's judge is recorded as Göran Lambertz^[15].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case Ö 91-12's judge is recorded as Johnny Herre^[16].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case Ö 91-12's judge is recorded as Martin Borgeke^[17].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case Ö 91-12's court is recorded as Supreme Court of Sweden^[18].
• Supreme Court of Sweden case Ö 91-12's Supreme Court of Sweden case number is recorded as Ö91-12^[19].