Home ›
Entities
› academia
› Signalling Sites of Contention in Judicial Discourse. An Exploratory Corpus- Based Analysis of Selected Stance Nouns in US Supreme Court Opinions and Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal Judgments
Signalling Sites of Contention in Judicial Discourse. An Exploratory Corpus- Based Analysis of Selected Stance Nouns in US Supreme Court Opinions and Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal Judgments
Research article (Comparative Legilinguistics, 2017) · cited 12× · AI/ML
Signalling Sites of Contention in Judicial Discourse. An Exploratory Corpus- Based Analysis of Selected Stance Nouns in US Supreme Court Opinions and Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal Judgments
Summary
Signalling Sites of Contention in Judicial Discourse. An Exploratory Corpus- Based Analysis of Selected Stance Nouns in US Supreme Court Opinions and Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal Judgments is a scholarly article[1].
Key Facts
Signalling Sites of Contention in Judicial Discourse. An Exploratory Corpus- Based Analysis of Selected Stance Nouns in US Supreme Court Opinions and Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal Judgments's instance of is recorded as scholarly article[2].
References
Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.
Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.
APA4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). Signalling Sites of Contention in Judicial Discourse. An Exploratory Corpus- Based Analysis of Selected Stance Nouns in US Supreme Court Opinions and Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal Judgments. Retrieved May 24, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/signalling-sites-of-contention-in-judicial-discourse-an-exploratory-corpus-based-analysis-of-selected-stance-nouns-in-us
MLA“Signalling Sites of Contention in Judicial Discourse. An Exploratory Corpus- Based Analysis of Selected Stance Nouns in US Supreme Court Opinions and Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal Judgments.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 24 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/signalling-sites-of-contention-in-judicial-discourse-an-exploratory-corpus-based-analysis-of-selected-stance-nouns-in-us.
BibTeX@misc{4ortxyz_signalling-sites-of-contention-in-judicial-discourse-an-exploratory-corpus-based-analysis-of-selected-stance-nouns-in-us_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{Signalling Sites of Contention in Judicial Discourse. An Exploratory Corpus- Based Analysis of Selected Stance Nouns in US Supreme Court Opinions and Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal Judgments}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/signalling-sites-of-contention-in-judicial-discourse-an-exploratory-corpus-based-analysis-of-selected-stance-nouns-in-us}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-24}}
LLM promptAccording to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): Signalling Sites of Contention in Judicial Discourse. An Exploratory Corpus- Based Analysis of Selected Stance Nouns in US Supreme Court Opinions and Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal Judgments — https://4ort.xyz/entity/signalling-sites-of-contention-in-judicial-discourse-an-exploratory-corpus-based-analysis-of-selected-stance-nouns-in-us (retrieved 2026-05-24)
