Home ›
Entities
› academia
› Past and present of computer-assisted dermoscopic diagnosis: performance of a conventional image analyser versus a convolutional neural network in a prospective data set of 1,981 skin lesions
Past and present of computer-assisted dermoscopic diagnosis: performance of a conventional image analyser versus a convolutional neural network in a prospective data set of 1,981 skin lesions
Research article (European Journal of Cancer, 2020) · cited 39× · AI/ML
Past and present of computer-assisted dermoscopic diagnosis: performance of a conventional image analyser versus a convolutional neural network in a prospective data set of 1,981 skin lesions
Summary
Past and present of computer-assisted dermoscopic diagnosis: performance of a conventional image analyser versus a convolutional neural network in a prospective data set of 1,981 skin lesions is a scholarly article[1].
Key Facts
Past and present of computer-assisted dermoscopic diagnosis: performance of a conventional image analyser versus a convolutional neural network in a prospective data set of 1,981 skin lesions's instance of is recorded as scholarly article[2].
References
Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.
Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.
APA4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). Past and present of computer-assisted dermoscopic diagnosis: performance of a conventional image analyser versus a convolutional neural network in a prospective data set of 1,981 skin lesions. Retrieved May 24, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/past-and-present-of-computer-assisted-dermoscopic-diagnosis-performance-of-a-conventional-image-analyser-versus-a-convol
MLA“Past and present of computer-assisted dermoscopic diagnosis: performance of a conventional image analyser versus a convolutional neural network in a prospective data set of 1,981 skin lesions.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 24 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/past-and-present-of-computer-assisted-dermoscopic-diagnosis-performance-of-a-conventional-image-analyser-versus-a-convol.
BibTeX@misc{4ortxyz_past-and-present-of-computer-assisted-dermoscopic-diagnosis-performance-of-a-conventional-image-analyser-versus-a-convol_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{Past and present of computer-assisted dermoscopic diagnosis: performance of a conventional image analyser versus a convolutional neural network in a prospective data set of 1,981 skin lesions}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/past-and-present-of-computer-assisted-dermoscopic-diagnosis-performance-of-a-conventional-image-analyser-versus-a-convol}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-24}}
LLM promptAccording to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): Past and present of computer-assisted dermoscopic diagnosis: performance of a conventional image analyser versus a convolutional neural network in a prospective data set of 1,981 skin lesions — https://4ort.xyz/entity/past-and-present-of-computer-assisted-dermoscopic-diagnosis-performance-of-a-conventional-image-analyser-versus-a-convol (retrieved 2026-05-24)
