Home › Entities › master_s_thesis › How Good Is Survey Design in Medical Libraries? A Systematic Review of User Surveys

How Good Is Survey Design in Medical Libraries? A Systematic Review of User Surveys

2009 master's thesis by Rachel Margaret Esson at Victoria University of Wellington
Place master_s_thesis Q111966217
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds

How Good Is Survey Design in Medical Libraries? A Systematic Review of User Surveys

Summary

How Good Is Survey Design in Medical Libraries? A Systematic Review of User Surveys is a master's thesis[1].

Key Facts

  • How Good Is Survey Design in Medical Libraries? A Systematic Review of User Surveys authored Rachel Esson[2].
  • How Good Is Survey Design in Medical Libraries? A Systematic Review of User Surveys's instance of is recorded as master's thesis[3].
  • How Good Is Survey Design in Medical Libraries? A Systematic Review of User Surveys's publisher is recorded as Open Access Repository Victoria University of Wellington[4].
  • How Good Is Survey Design in Medical Libraries? A Systematic Review of User Surveys's DOI is recorded as 10.26686/WGTN.16969858[5].
  • How Good Is Survey Design in Medical Libraries? A Systematic Review of User Surveys's language of work or name is recorded as English[6].
  • How Good Is Survey Design in Medical Libraries? A Systematic Review of User Surveys's country of origin is recorded as New Zealand[7].
  • How Good Is Survey Design in Medical Libraries? A Systematic Review of User Surveys's publication date is recorded as +2009-01-01T00:00:00Z[8].
  • How Good Is Survey Design in Medical Libraries? A Systematic Review of User Surveys's main subject is recorded as questionnaire[9].
  • How Good Is Survey Design in Medical Libraries? A Systematic Review of User Surveys's title is recorded as How Good Is Survey Design in Medical Libraries? A Systematic Review of User Surveys[10].
  • How Good Is Survey Design in Medical Libraries? A Systematic Review of User Surveys's copyright holder is recorded as Rachel Esson[11].
  • How Good Is Survey Design in Medical Libraries? A Systematic Review of User Surveys's thesis submitted to is recorded as Victoria University of Wellington[12].
  • How Good Is Survey Design in Medical Libraries? A Systematic Review of User Surveys's on focus list of Wikimedia project is recorded as NZThesisProject[13].
  • How Good Is Survey Design in Medical Libraries? A Systematic Review of User Surveys's copyright status is recorded as copyrighted[14].
  • How Good Is Survey Design in Medical Libraries? A Systematic Review of User Surveys's thesis committee member is recorded as Rowena Cullen[15].

Body

Designation and Status

How Good Is Survey Design in Medical Libraries? A Systematic Review of User Surveys's instance of is recorded as master's thesis[3].

References

Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.

Direct Wikidata claims

  1. [3] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  2. [2] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  3. [4] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  4. [5] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  5. [6] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  6. [7] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  7. [8] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  8. [9] ↑ . doi.org. doi.org. Provenance: wikidata.org.
  9. [10] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  10. [11] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  11. [12] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  12. [13] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  13. [14] ↑ . wikidata.org.
  14. [15] ↑ . wikidata.org.

Class ancestry

  1. [1] ↑ . Wikidata. wikidata.org.

📑 Cite this page

Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.

APA 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). How Good Is Survey Design in Medical Libraries? A Systematic Review of User Surveys. Retrieved May 3, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/how-good-is-survey-design-in-medical-libraries-a-systematic-review-of-user-surveys
MLA “How Good Is Survey Design in Medical Libraries? A Systematic Review of User Surveys.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 3 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/how-good-is-survey-design-in-medical-libraries-a-systematic-review-of-user-surveys.
BibTeX @misc{4ortxyz_how-good-is-survey-design-in-medical-libraries-a-systematic-review-of-user-surveys_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{How Good Is Survey Design in Medical Libraries? A Systematic Review of User Surveys}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/how-good-is-survey-design-in-medical-libraries-a-systematic-review-of-user-surveys}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-03}}
LLM prompt According to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): How Good Is Survey Design in Medical Libraries? A Systematic Review of User Surveys — https://4ort.xyz/entity/how-good-is-survey-design-in-medical-libraries-a-systematic-review-of-user-surveys (retrieved 2026-05-03)

Canonical URL: https://4ort.xyz/entity/how-good-is-survey-design-in-medical-libraries-a-systematic-review-of-user-surveys · Last refreshed: