Goodman v Searle
lawsuit claiming restitution of an artwork (1996)
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds
0 sources
Goodman v Searle
Summary
Goodman v Searle is a claim for restitution of an artwork[1].
Key Facts
- Goodman v Searle is in the country of United States[2].
- Goodman v Searle's instance of is recorded as claim for restitution of an artwork[3].
- +1996-00-00T00:00:00Z marks the founding of Goodman v Searle[4].
- Goodman v Searle's main subject is recorded as claim for restitution of an artwork[5].
- Goodman v Searle's main subject is recorded as Landscape with Smokestacks[6].
- Goodman v Searle's described at URL is recorded as https://plone.unige.ch/art-adr/cases-affaires/landscape-with-smokestacks-2013-friedrich-gutmann-heirs-and-daniel-searle[7].
- Goodman v Searle's described by source is recorded as Family Sues Collector, Says Degas Work Stolen By Nazis[8].
- Goodman v Searle's title is recorded as Goodman v. Searle[9].
- Goodman v Searle's defendant is recorded as Daniel C. Searle[10].
- Goodman v Searle's legal counsel is recorded as Sidley Austin[11].
- Goodman v Searle's legal counsel is recorded as Howard J. Trienens[12].
- Goodman v Searle's court is recorded as United States District Court for the Southern District of New York[13].