Home ›
Entities
› academia
› Genomic prediction of hybrid performance: comparison of the efficiency of factorial and tester designs used as training sets in a multiparental connected reciprocal design for maize silage
Genomic prediction of hybrid performance: comparison of the efficiency of factorial and tester designs used as training sets in a multiparental connected reciprocal design for maize silage
Research article (Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2022) · cited 14× · AI/ML
Genomic prediction of hybrid performance: comparison of the efficiency of factorial and tester designs used as training sets in a multiparental connected reciprocal design for maize silage
Summary
Genomic prediction of hybrid performance: comparison of the efficiency of factorial and tester designs used as training sets in a multiparental connected reciprocal design for maize silage is a scholarly article[1].
Key Facts
Genomic prediction of hybrid performance: comparison of the efficiency of factorial and tester designs used as training sets in a multiparental connected reciprocal design for maize silage's instance of is recorded as scholarly article[2].
References
Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.
Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.
APA4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). Genomic prediction of hybrid performance: comparison of the efficiency of factorial and tester designs used as training sets in a multiparental connected reciprocal design for maize silage. Retrieved May 24, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/genomic-prediction-of-hybrid-performance-comparison-of-the-efficiency-of-factorial-and-tester-designs-used-as-training-s
MLA“Genomic prediction of hybrid performance: comparison of the efficiency of factorial and tester designs used as training sets in a multiparental connected reciprocal design for maize silage.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 24 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/genomic-prediction-of-hybrid-performance-comparison-of-the-efficiency-of-factorial-and-tester-designs-used-as-training-s.
BibTeX@misc{4ortxyz_genomic-prediction-of-hybrid-performance-comparison-of-the-efficiency-of-factorial-and-tester-designs-used-as-training-s_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{Genomic prediction of hybrid performance: comparison of the efficiency of factorial and tester designs used as training sets in a multiparental connected reciprocal design for maize silage}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/genomic-prediction-of-hybrid-performance-comparison-of-the-efficiency-of-factorial-and-tester-designs-used-as-training-s}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-24}}
LLM promptAccording to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): Genomic prediction of hybrid performance: comparison of the efficiency of factorial and tester designs used as training sets in a multiparental connected reciprocal design for maize silage — https://4ort.xyz/entity/genomic-prediction-of-hybrid-performance-comparison-of-the-efficiency-of-factorial-and-tester-designs-used-as-training-s (retrieved 2026-05-24)
