Home ›
Entities
› academia
› Comparison of respiratory-triggered 3D MR cholangiopancreatography and breath-hold compressed-sensing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T and 3 T and impact of individual factors on image quality
Comparison of respiratory-triggered 3D MR cholangiopancreatography and breath-hold compressed-sensing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T and 3 T and impact of individual factors on image quality
Research article (European Journal of Radiology, 2021) · cited 18× · AI/ML
Comparison of respiratory-triggered 3D MR cholangiopancreatography and breath-hold compressed-sensing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T and 3 T and impact of individual factors on image quality
Summary
Comparison of respiratory-triggered 3D MR cholangiopancreatography and breath-hold compressed-sensing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T and 3 T and impact of individual factors on image quality is a scholarly article[1].
Key Facts
Comparison of respiratory-triggered 3D MR cholangiopancreatography and breath-hold compressed-sensing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T and 3 T and impact of individual factors on image quality's instance of is recorded as scholarly article[2].
References
Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.
Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.
APA4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). Comparison of respiratory-triggered 3D MR cholangiopancreatography and breath-hold compressed-sensing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T and 3 T and impact of individual factors on image quality. Retrieved May 24, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparison-of-respiratory-triggered-3d-mr-cholangiopancreatography-and-breath-hold-compressed-sensing-3d-mr-cholangiopan
MLA“Comparison of respiratory-triggered 3D MR cholangiopancreatography and breath-hold compressed-sensing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T and 3 T and impact of individual factors on image quality.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 24 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparison-of-respiratory-triggered-3d-mr-cholangiopancreatography-and-breath-hold-compressed-sensing-3d-mr-cholangiopan.
BibTeX@misc{4ortxyz_comparison-of-respiratory-triggered-3d-mr-cholangiopancreatography-and-breath-hold-compressed-sensing-3d-mr-cholangiopan_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{Comparison of respiratory-triggered 3D MR cholangiopancreatography and breath-hold compressed-sensing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T and 3 T and impact of individual factors on image quality}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparison-of-respiratory-triggered-3d-mr-cholangiopancreatography-and-breath-hold-compressed-sensing-3d-mr-cholangiopan}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-24}}
LLM promptAccording to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): Comparison of respiratory-triggered 3D MR cholangiopancreatography and breath-hold compressed-sensing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T and 3 T and impact of individual factors on image quality — https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparison-of-respiratory-triggered-3d-mr-cholangiopancreatography-and-breath-hold-compressed-sensing-3d-mr-cholangiopan (retrieved 2026-05-24)
