Home ›
Entities
› academia
› Comparison of reduced field‐of‐view diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) and conventional DWI techniques in the assessment of rectal carcinoma at 3.0T: Image quality and histological T staging
Comparison of reduced field‐of‐view diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) and conventional DWI techniques in the assessment of rectal carcinoma at 3.0T: Image quality and histological T staging
Research article (Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2017) · cited 80× · AI/ML
Comparison of reduced field‐of‐view diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) and conventional DWI techniques in the assessment of rectal carcinoma at 3.0T: Image quality and histological T staging
Summary
Comparison of reduced field‐of‐view diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) and conventional DWI techniques in the assessment of rectal carcinoma at 3.0T: Image quality and histological T staging is a scholarly article[1].
Key Facts
Comparison of reduced field‐of‐view diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) and conventional DWI techniques in the assessment of rectal carcinoma at 3.0T: Image quality and histological T staging's instance of is recorded as scholarly article[2].
References
Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.
Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.
APA4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). Comparison of reduced field‐of‐view diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) and conventional DWI techniques in the assessment of rectal carcinoma at 3.0T: Image quality and histological T staging. Retrieved May 24, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparison-of-reduced-fieldofview-diffusionweighted-imaging-dwi-and-conventional-dwi-techniques-in-the-assessment-of-rec
MLA“Comparison of reduced field‐of‐view diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) and conventional DWI techniques in the assessment of rectal carcinoma at 3.0T: Image quality and histological T staging.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 24 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparison-of-reduced-fieldofview-diffusionweighted-imaging-dwi-and-conventional-dwi-techniques-in-the-assessment-of-rec.
BibTeX@misc{4ortxyz_comparison-of-reduced-fieldofview-diffusionweighted-imaging-dwi-and-conventional-dwi-techniques-in-the-assessment-of-rec_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{Comparison of reduced field‐of‐view diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) and conventional DWI techniques in the assessment of rectal carcinoma at 3.0T: Image quality and histological T staging}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparison-of-reduced-fieldofview-diffusionweighted-imaging-dwi-and-conventional-dwi-techniques-in-the-assessment-of-rec}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-24}}
LLM promptAccording to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): Comparison of reduced field‐of‐view diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) and conventional DWI techniques in the assessment of rectal carcinoma at 3.0T: Image quality and histological T staging — https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparison-of-reduced-fieldofview-diffusionweighted-imaging-dwi-and-conventional-dwi-techniques-in-the-assessment-of-rec (retrieved 2026-05-24)
