Home ›
Entities
› academia
› Comparison of image quality and visibility of normal and abnormal findings at submillisievert chest CT using filtered back projection, iterative model reconstruction (IMR) and iDose 4 ™
Comparison of image quality and visibility of normal and abnormal findings at submillisievert chest CT using filtered back projection, iterative model reconstruction (IMR) and iDose 4 ™
Research article (European Journal of Radiology, 2016) · cited 31× · AI/ML
Comparison of image quality and visibility of normal and abnormal findings at submillisievert chest CT using filtered back projection, iterative model reconstruction (IMR) and iDose 4 ™
Summary
Comparison of image quality and visibility of normal and abnormal findings at submillisievert chest CT using filtered back projection, iterative model reconstruction (IMR) and iDose 4 ™ is a scholarly article[1].
Key Facts
Comparison of image quality and visibility of normal and abnormal findings at submillisievert chest CT using filtered back projection, iterative model reconstruction (IMR) and iDose 4 ™'s instance of is recorded as scholarly article[2].
References
Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.
Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.
APA4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). Comparison of image quality and visibility of normal and abnormal findings at submillisievert chest CT using filtered back projection, iterative model reconstruction (IMR) and iDose 4 ™. Retrieved May 24, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparison-of-image-quality-and-visibility-of-normal-and-abnormal-findings-at-submillisievert-chest-ct-using-filtered-ba
MLA“Comparison of image quality and visibility of normal and abnormal findings at submillisievert chest CT using filtered back projection, iterative model reconstruction (IMR) and iDose 4 ™.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 24 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparison-of-image-quality-and-visibility-of-normal-and-abnormal-findings-at-submillisievert-chest-ct-using-filtered-ba.
BibTeX@misc{4ortxyz_comparison-of-image-quality-and-visibility-of-normal-and-abnormal-findings-at-submillisievert-chest-ct-using-filtered-ba_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{Comparison of image quality and visibility of normal and abnormal findings at submillisievert chest CT using filtered back projection, iterative model reconstruction (IMR) and iDose 4 ™}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparison-of-image-quality-and-visibility-of-normal-and-abnormal-findings-at-submillisievert-chest-ct-using-filtered-ba}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-24}}
LLM promptAccording to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): Comparison of image quality and visibility of normal and abnormal findings at submillisievert chest CT using filtered back projection, iterative model reconstruction (IMR) and iDose 4 ™ — https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparison-of-image-quality-and-visibility-of-normal-and-abnormal-findings-at-submillisievert-chest-ct-using-filtered-ba (retrieved 2026-05-24)