Home ›
Entities
› academia
› Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine
Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine
Research article (Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2020) · cited 157× · AI/ML
Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine
Summary
Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine is a scholarly article[1].
Key Facts
Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine's instance of is recorded as scholarly article[2].
References
Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.
Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.
APA4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine. Retrieved May 24, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparison-of-conventional-photogrammetry-and-intraoral-scanning-accuracy-of-complete-arch-implant-impression-procedures
MLA“Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 24 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparison-of-conventional-photogrammetry-and-intraoral-scanning-accuracy-of-complete-arch-implant-impression-procedures.
BibTeX@misc{4ortxyz_comparison-of-conventional-photogrammetry-and-intraoral-scanning-accuracy-of-complete-arch-implant-impression-procedures_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparison-of-conventional-photogrammetry-and-intraoral-scanning-accuracy-of-complete-arch-implant-impression-procedures}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-24}}
LLM promptAccording to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine — https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparison-of-conventional-photogrammetry-and-intraoral-scanning-accuracy-of-complete-arch-implant-impression-procedures (retrieved 2026-05-24)
