Home › Entities › academia › Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study

Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study

Research article (Journal of Dentistry, 2023) · cited 45× · AI/ML
academia openalex:W4377944136
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds

Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study

Summary

Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study is a scholarly article[1].

Key Facts

  • Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study's instance of is recorded as scholarly article[2].

References

Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.

Direct Wikidata claims

  1. [2] ↑ . wikidata.org.

Class ancestry

  1. [1] ↑ . Wikidata. wikidata.org.

📑 Cite this page

Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.

APA 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study. Retrieved May 24, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparing-the-accuracy-of-full-arch-implant-impressions-using-the-conventional-technique-and-digital-scans-with-and-with
MLA “Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 24 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparing-the-accuracy-of-full-arch-implant-impressions-using-the-conventional-technique-and-digital-scans-with-and-with.
BibTeX @misc{4ortxyz_comparing-the-accuracy-of-full-arch-implant-impressions-using-the-conventional-technique-and-digital-scans-with-and-with_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparing-the-accuracy-of-full-arch-implant-impressions-using-the-conventional-technique-and-digital-scans-with-and-with}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-24}}
LLM prompt According to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study — https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparing-the-accuracy-of-full-arch-implant-impressions-using-the-conventional-technique-and-digital-scans-with-and-with (retrieved 2026-05-24)

Canonical URL: https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparing-the-accuracy-of-full-arch-implant-impressions-using-the-conventional-technique-and-digital-scans-with-and-with · Last refreshed: