A philosophical critique of the best interests test as a criterion for decision making in law and clinical practice

Summary

A philosophical critique of the best interests test as a criterion for decision making in law and clinical practice is a doctoral thesis^[1].

Key Facts

• A philosophical critique of the best interests test as a criterion for decision making in law and clinical practice authored Rosemary Godbold^[2].
• A philosophical critique of the best interests test as a criterion for decision making in law and clinical practice's instance of is recorded as doctoral thesis^[3].
• A philosophical critique of the best interests test as a criterion for decision making in law and clinical practice's publisher is recorded as Tuwhera Open Access Publisher^[4].
• A philosophical critique of the best interests test as a criterion for decision making in law and clinical practice's language of work or name is recorded as English^[5].
• A philosophical critique of the best interests test as a criterion for decision making in law and clinical practice's country of origin is recorded as New Zealand^[6].
• A philosophical critique of the best interests test as a criterion for decision making in law and clinical practice's publication date is recorded as +2007-00-00T00:00:00Z^[7].
• A philosophical critique of the best interests test as a criterion for decision making in law and clinical practice's Handle ID is recorded as 10292/336^[8].
• A philosophical critique of the best interests test as a criterion for decision making in law and clinical practice's title is recorded as A philosophical critique of the best interests test as a criterion for decision making in law and clinical practice^[9].
• A philosophical critique of the best interests test as a criterion for decision making in law and clinical practice's copyright holder is recorded as Rosemary Godbold^[10].
• A philosophical critique of the best interests test as a criterion for decision making in law and clinical practice's thesis submitted to is recorded as Auckland University of Technology^[11].
• A philosophical critique of the best interests test as a criterion for decision making in law and clinical practice's on focus list of Wikimedia project is recorded as NZThesisProject^[12].
• A philosophical critique of the best interests test as a criterion for decision making in law and clinical practice's copyright status is recorded as copyrighted^[13].
• A philosophical critique of the best interests test as a criterion for decision making in law and clinical practice's thesis committee member is recorded as Kate Diesfeld^[14].
• A philosophical critique of the best interests test as a criterion for decision making in law and clinical practice's thesis committee member is recorded as David Seedhouse^[15].

Body

Designation and Status

A philosophical critique of the best interests test as a criterion for decision making in law and clinical practice's instance of is recorded as doctoral thesis^[3].