equivocation
fallacy; misleading use of a term with more than one meaning or sense
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds
0 sources
equivocation
Summary
equivocation ranks in the top 2% of general entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (69 views/month).[1]
Key Facts
- equivocation's subclass of is recorded as verbal fallacy[2].
- equivocation's subclass of is recorded as deceptive communication technique[3].
- equivocation's subclass of is recorded as fallacies of ambiguity[4].
- equivocation's Freebase ID is recorded as /m/04h0v[5].
- equivocation's described by source is recorded as Lean Logic[6].
- equivocation's partially coincident with is recorded as antanaclasis[7].
- equivocation's Encyclopædia Britannica Online ID is recorded as topic/equivocation[8].
- equivocation's different from is recorded as equivocation[9].
- equivocation's different from is recorded as antanaclasis[10].
- equivocation's uses is recorded as polysemous word[11].
- equivocation's JSTOR topic ID is recorded as equivocation[12].
- equivocation's Microsoft Academic ID is recorded as 17859611[13].
- equivocation's OpenAlex ID is recorded as C17859611[14].
- equivocation's Great Russian Encyclopedia portal ID is recorded as ekvivokatsiia-1d73e1[15].
Why It Matters
equivocation ranks in the top 2% of general entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (69 views/month).[1] equivocation has Wikipedia articles in 18 language editions, a strong signal of global cultural recognition.[16]